I toyed with writing an extension method, also with inheriting from IList and implementing my own Sort() method birli well bey casting to a List but none of these seemed overly elegant.
Then the person calling the method is free to call it with any data type that is enumerable. This allows your code to be used in unexpected, but perfectly valid ways.
Here's an example: I had a project once where our lists got very large, and resulting fragmentation of the large object heap was hurting performance. We replaced List with LinkedList. LinkedList does not contain an array, so all of a sudden, we had almost no use of the large object heap.
Why does the Clausius inequality involve a single term/integral if we consider a body interacting with multiple heat sources/sinks?
Use whatever you want. It's your method. You're the only one who gets to see the internal implementation details of the method.
The Liskov Substitution Principle (simplified) states that a derived type should be able to C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır be used in place of a base type, with no additional preconditions or postconditions.
You are most often better of using the most general usable type, in this case the IList C# IList Kullanımı or even better the IEnumerable interface, so that you can switch the implementation conveniently at a later time.
If you specify your methods to return an interface that means you are free to change the exact implementation later on without the consuming method ever knowing.
If you are exposing your class through a library that others will use, you generally want to expose it via interfaces rather than concrete implementations.
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues bey the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .
However, this makes the method more fragile, bey any change C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır to the returned object type may break the calling code. In practice though, that generally isn't a major sıkıntı.
This is usually guaranteed for a specific implementation of a container (List documentation: "It implements the IList generic interface using an array whose size is dynamically increased C# IList Nedir bey required.").
When talking about return types, the more specific you are, the more C# IList Kullanımı flexible callers güç be with it.
If you had used IList in the rest of the app you could extend List with your own custom class and still be able to pass that around without refactoring.